← Back to Blog Article

Spotlight vs. Figma for UI Screenshots: What's Faster?

·

You need to show a teammate one button on a page — highlighted, with the rest dimmed so it’s obvious. If you’re like a lot of designers and front-end folks, your reflex is: screenshot the page, paste it into Figma, draw a rectangle, dim the background, export. It works. It also takes a few minutes you didn’t really want to spend.

The Figma screenshot workflow is the default for a lot of teams because Figma is already open and everyone knows it. But “already open” isn’t the same as “fastest.” This is an honest comparison of the Figma approach versus a one-click browser extension like Spotlight — where each wins, and roughly how much time sits between them.

Why this comparison matters

Highlighting a UI element for a bug report, a doc, or a design note is a tiny task you do many times a day. At a few minutes each, the cost is invisible per instance and significant over a week. The question isn’t “can Figma do it” — Figma can do almost anything. It’s “is a general-purpose design tool the right weight for a 10-second job?”

The honest answer depends on what you’re making. So let’s walk both workflows step by step.

The Figma screenshot workflow

Here’s the path most people actually take when highlighting an element in Figma:

  1. Take a screenshot of the page (Cmd+Shift+4 / Win+Shift+S)
  2. Switch to Figma, paste the image into a frame
  3. Draw a rectangle over the whole image, fill it black, drop the opacity to ~50% — that’s your dim layer
  4. Draw a second rectangle around the element you want to highlight and cut it out of the dim layer (or add a bright border)
  5. Maybe add an arrow or a label
  6. Select the frame, export as PNG, find it in your downloads, share it

Pros: Total control. Pixel-perfect alignment, exact brand colours, reusable components, and you can keep annotating — arrows, callouts, multiple states on one canvas. For polished documentation, onboarding decks, or design specs, this is genuinely the right tool.

Cons: It’s 5–7 manual steps and a couple of minutes once you account for context-switching, getting the dim opacity consistent, and exporting. Do it twice with slightly different settings and your screenshots won’t match. And the moment the page changes, the whole thing is stale — you re-shoot and redo the overlay from scratch.

The Spotlight workflow

Spotlight does the highlighting on the live page, before you ever take the screenshot:

  1. Click the floating button to start (or press Alt+Shift+S)
  2. Click the element you want — it stays lit, everything else dims
  3. Press S, click, and the focused screenshot saves to your downloads

That’s it — three actions, no second app, no manual overlay.

Spotlight highlighting the headline and a button on the Vercel homepage in violet while the rest of the page is heavily dimmed

Pros: Fast — highlight and capture in well under 10 seconds. The dim and the bounding box are consistent every time because they’re generated, not hand-drawn. Page context stays intact, so the viewer sees where the element lives. Re-shooting after a page change is just clicking again.

Cons: Less annotation flexibility than a full design tool. No freehand arrows or multi-state canvases, and the styling options are deliberately limited (accent colour, dim intensity, labels). If you need a composed figure with callouts and captions, this isn’t that.

Side by side

Figma workflowSpotlight
Steps5–7 (screenshot → paste → dim → cut out → export)3 (start → click → capture)
Time per shot~2–4 minutesUnder 10 seconds
ConsistencyManual — varies per shotGenerated — identical every time
Page contextPreserved (if you screenshot the full page)Preserved by design
Annotation depthHigh — arrows, labels, multi-stateLow — highlight + dim + simple labels
Re-shoot after page changeRedo the overlay from scratchClick again
Best atPolished figures, specs, decksFast, repeatable highlight-and-capture

So which should you use?

It’s not really Spotlight versus Figma — they’re tuned for different jobs.

Reach for Figma when the screenshot is a deliverable in itself: a documentation figure with callouts, an onboarding walkthrough, a design spec, anything that needs arrows, captions, or several annotated states on one canvas. The extra minutes buy you control you actually need there.

Reach for Spotlight when the highlight is the whole point and you want it now: bug reports, Slack messages, PR descriptions, quick docs, async updates. The kind of screenshot you take ten times a day and never want to think about. (If you’re weighing other options too, our guide to highlighting webpage elements covers manual cropping and DevTools as well.)

A useful rule of thumb: if you’d feel silly opening a full design tool for the task, you probably want the extension. If the output is going in front of stakeholders and needs to look composed, the design tool earns its keep.

The takeaway

Figma isn’t slow because it’s bad — it’s slow because it’s general. For the specific, repeated job of “highlight this element and capture it,” a purpose-built tool collapses a five-step, few-minute workflow into three clicks and ten seconds, with consistency you don’t have to babysit. Match the tool to the task and you stop paying the design-tool tax on screenshots that were never meant to be design work.

Curious how the three-click version feels? Add Spotlight to your browser — it’s free, and your next bug-report screenshot is done before Figma would have finished loading the paste.

Ajoy Gonsalves
Ajoy Gonsalves Founder of Spotlight

I build software that fixes the small, annoying problems we all put up with. Here I write about Spotlight, the craft behind it, and better ways to communicate visually.

ajoygonsalves.com →

Related posts

Ready to try Spotlight?

Free for individuals. Pro at €20 lifetime.

Get Spotlight — it's free